<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 888 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a case concerning penalty and interest for late payment of duty. The Tribunal found that duty payment was not delayed as per the relevant rules, leading to the reduction of penalty and demand of duty amount. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretation of the rules, resulting in the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:37:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 888 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a case concerning penalty and interest for late payment of duty. The Tribunal found that duty payment was not delayed as per the relevant rules, leading to the reduction of penalty and demand of duty amount. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretation of the rules, resulting in the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>