https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330287 Physical shipment from the notified country of export could not be insisted upon where the anti-dumping notification, as later corrected by a corrigendum, no longer supported that interpretation. A prior clarification from the Designated Authority had stated that a commercial invoice from the exporter in the notified country would suffice, and the corrigendum operated from the date of the original notification. On that basis, the customs demand for proof of physical shipment was unsustainable, and the impugned orders were quashed in favour of the importers. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330287 Physical shipment from the notified country of export could not be insisted upon where the anti-dumping notification, as later corrected by a corrigendum, no longer supported that interpretation. A prior clarification from the Designated Authority had stated that a commercial invoice from the exporter in the notified country would suffice, and the corrigendum operated from the date of the original notification. On that basis, the customs demand for proof of physical shipment was unsustainable, and the impugned orders were quashed in favour of the importers. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330287