<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 880 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330282</link>
    <description>Input tax credit reversal cannot be sustained where the assessment is completed on grounds not disclosed in the pre-revision notice and without seeking the further particulars later relied on. The dealer had filed objections and supporting documents, but the authority reversed credit for alleged absence of bank statements, commodity details and other particulars not put to the dealer in advance. The HC held that, if the existing material was found insufficient, the authority should have called for clarification before finalising the assessment. Proceeding on a different footing denied a fair opportunity and breached natural justice, so the assessment orders were quashed and the matters remanded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:13:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 880 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330282</link>
      <description>Input tax credit reversal cannot be sustained where the assessment is completed on grounds not disclosed in the pre-revision notice and without seeking the further particulars later relied on. The dealer had filed objections and supporting documents, but the authority reversed credit for alleged absence of bank statements, commodity details and other particulars not put to the dealer in advance. The HC held that, if the existing material was found insufficient, the authority should have called for clarification before finalising the assessment. Proceeding on a different footing denied a fair opportunity and breached natural justice, so the assessment orders were quashed and the matters remanded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>