<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330280</link>
    <description>Reversal of input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was held procedurally defective where the assessee had sought invoice details, seller names, dates and sale values to answer the proposal, but the assessment order confirmed reversal without supplying those particulars or giving reasons. The defect was treated as a breach of natural justice because it denied a meaningful opportunity to object. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration with the requisite particulars, objection opportunity and personal hearing, while the remaining disputed factual issues were left to be pursued under the statutory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:13:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330280</link>
      <description>Reversal of input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was held procedurally defective where the assessee had sought invoice details, seller names, dates and sale values to answer the proposal, but the assessment order confirmed reversal without supplying those particulars or giving reasons. The defect was treated as a breach of natural justice because it denied a meaningful opportunity to object. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration with the requisite particulars, objection opportunity and personal hearing, while the remaining disputed factual issues were left to be pursued under the statutory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>