https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184828 The State's stock-control order for edible oilseeds and edible oils remained operative because the later Central amendment deleting those commodities from the Central Storage Control Order did not amend, repeal or override the State Order issued with prior Central concurrence under the Essential Commodities Act. The Court found no repugnancy or constitutional infirmity in the State directions, as the State acted within delegated powers and no subsisting Central prohibition conflicted with its stock-limit measures. A prior dismissal of special leave in a similar matter, without reasons, did not create merger or binding precedent and did not foreclose merits-based consideration. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184828 The State's stock-control order for edible oilseeds and edible oils remained operative because the later Central amendment deleting those commodities from the Central Storage Control Order did not amend, repeal or override the State Order issued with prior Central concurrence under the Essential Commodities Act. The Court found no repugnancy or constitutional infirmity in the State directions, as the State acted within delegated powers and no subsisting Central prohibition conflicted with its stock-limit measures. A prior dismissal of special leave in a similar matter, without reasons, did not create merger or binding precedent and did not foreclose merits-based consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184828