<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 512 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184825</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner must deduct TDS on payments to transport operators under Section 194C. The court upheld Circular No. 681 issued by the CBDT, stating it was within the Board&#039;s jurisdiction and consistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of &quot;any work.&quot; Additionally, the court clarified that Explanation III to Section 194C is clarificatory and applies retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 512 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184825</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner must deduct TDS on payments to transport operators under Section 194C. The court upheld Circular No. 681 issued by the CBDT, stating it was within the Board&#039;s jurisdiction and consistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of &quot;any work.&quot; Additionally, the court clarified that Explanation III to Section 194C is clarificatory and applies retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>