<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (8) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184820</link>
    <description>&quot;Sufficient cause&quot; for condoning delay in seeking to set aside abatement is to be assessed liberally on the facts of each case, including difficulty in identifying legal representatives and the applicant&#039;s absence from the place where the application had to be made. The note further states that a trial court&#039;s discretionary order under the Limitation Act should not be disturbed on appeal unless the exercise of discretion is plainly unsustainable. On that approach, the delay was treated as sufficiently explained and the condonation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (8) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184820</link>
      <description>&quot;Sufficient cause&quot; for condoning delay in seeking to set aside abatement is to be assessed liberally on the facts of each case, including difficulty in identifying legal representatives and the applicant&#039;s absence from the place where the application had to be made. The note further states that a trial court&#039;s discretionary order under the Limitation Act should not be disturbed on appeal unless the exercise of discretion is plainly unsustainable. On that approach, the delay was treated as sufficiently explained and the condonation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>