https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184820 Sufficient cause for delay under the Indian Limitation Act requires a reasonably liberal, fact-specific assessment rather than an unduly strict standard. Difficulty in identifying proper legal representatives, a party's absence, and the need to communicate before filing may support condonation. Where a trial court has material supporting its discretionary decision to set aside abatement and condone delay, appellate interference is unwarranted unless that discretion is plainly unsustainable. The delay was treated as sufficiently explained, the abatement remained set aside, and the appeal failed. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:23:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184820 Sufficient cause for delay under the Indian Limitation Act requires a reasonably liberal, fact-specific assessment rather than an unduly strict standard. Difficulty in identifying proper legal representatives, a party's absence, and the need to communicate before filing may support condonation. Where a trial court has material supporting its discretionary decision to set aside abatement and condone delay, appellate interference is unwarranted unless that discretion is plainly unsustainable. The delay was treated as sufficiently explained, the abatement remained set aside, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184820