https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330275 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Commissioner's order, emphasizing the principle of alternative remedy. The Court refrained from interference, advising the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate process. It highlighted that when a statutory forum exists, a writ petition should not be entertained, ensuring effective relief. The Court stressed that Article 226 jurisdiction should be invoked only when the statutory remedy is inadequate. The judgment underscored the importance of following the statutory appellate process for redressal of grievances, in accordance with the principle of alternative remedy and the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226. en-us Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:57:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330275 The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Commissioner's order, emphasizing the principle of alternative remedy. The Court refrained from interference, advising the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate process. It highlighted that when a statutory forum exists, a writ petition should not be entertained, ensuring effective relief. The Court stressed that Article 226 jurisdiction should be invoked only when the statutory remedy is inadequate. The judgment underscored the importance of following the statutory appellate process for redressal of grievances, in accordance with the principle of alternative remedy and the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330275