<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 869 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330271</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed M/S Cipla Ltd.&#039;s rebate claim on duty paid for exported goods, as they only availed the Customs portion of drawback. However, the Department challenged this decision, arguing that simultaneous benefit of rebate and drawback is impermissible. The Department contended that claiming both benefits violates Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, as duty drawback cannot be claimed if Cenvat Credit is availed. Additionally, the Central Government rejected the Department&#039;s Revision Application due to filing beyond the stipulated three-month period, deeming it time-barred without considering the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 869 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330271</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed M/S Cipla Ltd.&#039;s rebate claim on duty paid for exported goods, as they only availed the Customs portion of drawback. However, the Department challenged this decision, arguing that simultaneous benefit of rebate and drawback is impermissible. The Department contended that claiming both benefits violates Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, as duty drawback cannot be claimed if Cenvat Credit is availed. Additionally, the Central Government rejected the Department&#039;s Revision Application due to filing beyond the stipulated three-month period, deeming it time-barred without considering the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>