<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 865 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330267</link>
    <description>The Revision Application was rejected by the Government due to discrepancies in document submission, procedural lapses, and the necessity of strict compliance with conditions for claiming rebates under relevant notifications. The Government upheld the decisions of the appellate authority, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling all mandatory requirements for rebate claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:53:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 865 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330267</link>
      <description>The Revision Application was rejected by the Government due to discrepancies in document submission, procedural lapses, and the necessity of strict compliance with conditions for claiming rebates under relevant notifications. The Government upheld the decisions of the appellate authority, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling all mandatory requirements for rebate claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>