<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 861 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330263</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order that directed payment without a show-cause notice. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with instructions for proper notice, personal hearing, and decision based on merits and law. The Court highlighted the need for automated despatch procedures to ensure effective service and raised concerns about the current manual system&#039;s reliability. No costs were imposed in this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 861 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330263</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order that directed payment without a show-cause notice. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with instructions for proper notice, personal hearing, and decision based on merits and law. The Court highlighted the need for automated despatch procedures to ensure effective service and raised concerns about the current manual system&#039;s reliability. No costs were imposed in this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>