<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 859 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no violations of the CHALR regulations by the CHA, setting aside the impugned orders. The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, was directed to restore the CHA license and forfeited security deposit within four weeks due to the lack of evidence and reliance on assumptions by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 859 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no violations of the CHALR regulations by the CHA, setting aside the impugned orders. The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, was directed to restore the CHA license and forfeited security deposit within four weeks due to the lack of evidence and reliance on assumptions by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>