<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 858 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330260</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Respondent to process the refund claims of the Petitioners for specified periods and issue orders granting refunds with interest under Section 38 of the DVAT Act within eight weeks. The petitions were allowed, with no orders as to costs, and the Petitioners were advised to seek relief if the Respondent did not comply with the directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 858 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330260</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Respondent to process the refund claims of the Petitioners for specified periods and issue orders granting refunds with interest under Section 38 of the DVAT Act within eight weeks. The petitions were allowed, with no orders as to costs, and the Petitioners were advised to seek relief if the Respondent did not comply with the directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>