<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 131 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4217</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It ruled that there was inadequate disclosure by the petitioner, leading to the conclusion that income had indeed escaped assessment. The court emphasized the importance of providing full and accurate information to the Assessing Officer, ultimately rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments and denying the application for a stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 131 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4217</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It ruled that there was inadequate disclosure by the petitioner, leading to the conclusion that income had indeed escaped assessment. The court emphasized the importance of providing full and accurate information to the Assessing Officer, ultimately rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments and denying the application for a stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>