https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330255 A shareholders' agreement containing an arbitration clause governed the parties' relationship, and disputes rooted in its terms were treated as contractual and arbitrable. Complaints about meeting notice, share valuation, and allotment were linked to the agreement and amendments, but they did not disclose malice, oppression, or mismanagement in the company. The commentary therefore indicates that mere invocation of sections 397 and 398 is insufficient where the substance of the grievance is breach of contract rather than conduct justifying company law relief, and the parties must pursue the agreed arbitral mechanism. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:40:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330255 A shareholders' agreement containing an arbitration clause governed the parties' relationship, and disputes rooted in its terms were treated as contractual and arbitrable. Complaints about meeting notice, share valuation, and allotment were linked to the agreement and amendments, but they did not disclose malice, oppression, or mismanagement in the company. The commentary therefore indicates that mere invocation of sections 397 and 398 is insufficient where the substance of the grievance is breach of contract rather than conduct justifying company law relief, and the parties must pursue the agreed arbitral mechanism. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330255