<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 850 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330252</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act to reopen the assessment for A.Y. 1986-87 beyond the prescribed period and without disclosure of material facts to be without jurisdiction. The decision relied on legal precedents, including the case law Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Ltd., emphasizing that a subsequent reversal of legal position does not warrant reopening assessments beyond four years without failure to disclose material facts. The judgment aligned with the petitioner, citing the retrospective effect of relevant amendments to the Act from 1989.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 850 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330252</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act to reopen the assessment for A.Y. 1986-87 beyond the prescribed period and without disclosure of material facts to be without jurisdiction. The decision relied on legal precedents, including the case law Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Ltd., emphasizing that a subsequent reversal of legal position does not warrant reopening assessments beyond four years without failure to disclose material facts. The judgment aligned with the petitioner, citing the retrospective effect of relevant amendments to the Act from 1989.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>