https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184811 The ancillary supply pricing dispute was treated as governed by the BIFR proceedings and the undertaking binding the parties. Since part payment had already been made and the remaining liability was to be worked out within that framework, no fresh adjudication on the merits of revised prices or payment terms was undertaken in the appeals. The substantive rights and liabilities were left to be determined under the BIFR process, and no further appellate relief was granted. en-us Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:34:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184811 The ancillary supply pricing dispute was treated as governed by the BIFR proceedings and the undertaking binding the parties. Since part payment had already been made and the remaining liability was to be worked out within that framework, no fresh adjudication on the merits of revised prices or payment terms was undertaken in the appeals. The substantive rights and liabilities were left to be determined under the BIFR process, and no further appellate relief was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184811