<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1263 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184805</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit direction under Section 129E of the Customs Act was held unsustainable where the customs authorities were already in possession of the seized goods and part of the goods had been ordered to be released. On those facts, the Court found that requiring a further deposit was not justified. The pre-deposit order was therefore set aside in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1263 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184805</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit direction under Section 129E of the Customs Act was held unsustainable where the customs authorities were already in possession of the seized goods and part of the goods had been ordered to be released. On those facts, the Court found that requiring a further deposit was not justified. The pre-deposit order was therefore set aside in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>