<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 928 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184800</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI directed the appellant, a Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator facing financial hardship, to make a further pre-deposit of Rs. 2.00 lakhs towards Service Tax, with the remaining amount and penalties waived upon compliance within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in the vacation of stay and appeal dismissal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of contractual agreements in determining service nature, considered appellant&#039;s financial circumstances, and aimed to balance interests while ensuring tax compliance. The decision reflected a pragmatic approach, requiring timely adherence for maintaining stay and appeal validity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 928 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184800</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI directed the appellant, a Rent-a-Cab Scheme Operator facing financial hardship, to make a further pre-deposit of Rs. 2.00 lakhs towards Service Tax, with the remaining amount and penalties waived upon compliance within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in the vacation of stay and appeal dismissal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of contractual agreements in determining service nature, considered appellant&#039;s financial circumstances, and aimed to balance interests while ensuring tax compliance. The decision reflected a pragmatic approach, requiring timely adherence for maintaining stay and appeal validity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>