<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 625 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that appeals against assessment orders passed under s. 264 were maintainable before the CIT(A) as they constituted fresh assessment orders, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s assertion. The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing reconsideration by the CIT(A) in line with the law, emphasizing the appealability of such fresh assessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 625 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that appeals against assessment orders passed under s. 264 were maintainable before the CIT(A) as they constituted fresh assessment orders, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s assertion. The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing reconsideration by the CIT(A) in line with the law, emphasizing the appealability of such fresh assessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>