https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184791 Compliance with a statutory notice-and-explanation procedure under section 298 of the Assam Municipal Act was treated as sufficient to satisfy natural justice, because the Board received notice and an opportunity to explain and did not seek an oral hearing or further material time. The supersession charges in the final notification were held to correspond substantially with the substantive allegations in the show-cause notice, despite a different sequence and some inferential matters. A tentative view expressed in the notice was not treated as prejudgment, since the authority remained open to persuasion. On that reasoning, the supersession order was upheld. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:31:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184791 Compliance with a statutory notice-and-explanation procedure under section 298 of the Assam Municipal Act was treated as sufficient to satisfy natural justice, because the Board received notice and an opportunity to explain and did not seek an oral hearing or further material time. The supersession charges in the final notification were held to correspond substantially with the substantive allegations in the show-cause notice, despite a different sequence and some inferential matters. A tentative view expressed in the notice was not treated as prejudgment, since the authority remained open to persuasion. On that reasoning, the supersession order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184791