<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 828 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 43,12,500 while deleting Rs. 34,37,500 previously offered. It was determined that the total cash received and tax offered were pivotal in the decision. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the possibility of a tax credit if income overlap was established in the subsequent year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 828 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 43,12,500 while deleting Rs. 34,37,500 previously offered. It was determined that the total cash received and tax offered were pivotal in the decision. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the possibility of a tax credit if income overlap was established in the subsequent year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>