<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 55 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4207</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial order affecting rights must disclose the facts considered, the issue decided, and the reasoning adopted; a bare conclusory rejection is incapable of review and is liable to be set aside. Where the Tribunal gave no discussion of the VDIS disclosure, relevant facts, or the legal submissions, the appellate court treated the order as unreasoned and remanded the matter for fresh decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 55 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4207</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial order affecting rights must disclose the facts considered, the issue decided, and the reasoning adopted; a bare conclusory rejection is incapable of review and is liable to be set aside. Where the Tribunal gave no discussion of the VDIS disclosure, relevant facts, or the legal submissions, the appellate court treated the order as unreasoned and remanded the matter for fresh decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>