<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184787</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions while expressly leaving the question of law open. No substantive ruling was given on the central excise issue, so the order has only the limited effect of disposing of the petitions without deciding the legal question raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184787</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions while expressly leaving the question of law open. No substantive ruling was given on the central excise issue, so the order has only the limited effect of disposing of the petitions without deciding the legal question raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>