https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184781 A writ petition challenging a show cause notice under the U. P. Sales Tax Act was held premature because the dispute involved factual questions, including the nature of the petitioner's business and the applicability of the statutory provisions in the notice. The Sales Tax Officer was the proper authority to examine the factual and legal objections in the first instance, and the petitioner had not yet filed a reply. At the stage of a mere notice, there was no sufficient basis for writ interference, so the show cause proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Tue, 24 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:10:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184781 A writ petition challenging a show cause notice under the U. P. Sales Tax Act was held premature because the dispute involved factual questions, including the nature of the petitioner's business and the applicability of the statutory provisions in the notice. The Sales Tax Officer was the proper authority to examine the factual and legal objections in the first instance, and the petitioner had not yet filed a reply. At the stage of a mere notice, there was no sufficient basis for writ interference, so the show cause proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 24 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184781