https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330207 The Government set aside the decision rejecting rebate claims for duty paid on exported Cast Iron Products due to simultaneous availment of duty drawback and rebate, stating that simultaneous claims do not amount to double benefits. Procedural discrepancies in the rebate claims were noted, requiring verification based on original documents. The question of interest on delayed refunds was moot pending reconsideration of the rebate claims. The case was remanded back for fresh consideration with an emphasis on providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing for all concerned parties. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:43:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330207 The Government set aside the decision rejecting rebate claims for duty paid on exported Cast Iron Products due to simultaneous availment of duty drawback and rebate, stating that simultaneous claims do not amount to double benefits. Procedural discrepancies in the rebate claims were noted, requiring verification based on original documents. The question of interest on delayed refunds was moot pending reconsideration of the rebate claims. The case was remanded back for fresh consideration with an emphasis on providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing for all concerned parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330207