<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 803 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330205</link>
    <description>The Government rejected the revision application filed by M/S Themis Medicare Limited regarding a duty rebate claim under Notification No. 21/2004-CE(NT) for exported goods. The claim was denied due to the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with the required declaration and procedural conditions before exporting finished goods. Despite the applicant&#039;s arguments and citation of case laws, the Government emphasized the mandatory nature of compliance with notification conditions and upheld the rejection of the rebate claim by the Commissioner (Appeals). The revision application was deemed meritless, and the initial decision was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:43:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 803 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330205</link>
      <description>The Government rejected the revision application filed by M/S Themis Medicare Limited regarding a duty rebate claim under Notification No. 21/2004-CE(NT) for exported goods. The claim was denied due to the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with the required declaration and procedural conditions before exporting finished goods. Despite the applicant&#039;s arguments and citation of case laws, the Government emphasized the mandatory nature of compliance with notification conditions and upheld the rejection of the rebate claim by the Commissioner (Appeals). The revision application was deemed meritless, and the initial decision was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>