<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 793 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330195</link>
    <description>The government upheld the original adjudicating authority&#039;s valuation of goods, the levy of interest under Section 28AB, and the original fine and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have erred in allowing abatement on the value of goods and reducing the fine and penalty. The Revision Applications were disposed of accordingly, restoring the Order-in-Original.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 793 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330195</link>
      <description>The government upheld the original adjudicating authority&#039;s valuation of goods, the levy of interest under Section 28AB, and the original fine and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have erred in allowing abatement on the value of goods and reducing the fine and penalty. The Revision Applications were disposed of accordingly, restoring the Order-in-Original.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>