https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330191 The writ petitions challenging the reassessment order were held not maintainable because the order was appealable under the Karnataka VAT Act and the petitioners had an efficacious statutory remedy. The objections on natural justice and computation of taxable turnover were treated as issues that could be raised before the appellate authority, and the restriction on remand under Section 62(6-A) did not justify bypassing the appeal. As notice had been issued and objections filed, no serious breach of natural justice, patent lack of jurisdiction, or other exceptional ground for interference under Article 226 was shown. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330191 The writ petitions challenging the reassessment order were held not maintainable because the order was appealable under the Karnataka VAT Act and the petitioners had an efficacious statutory remedy. The objections on natural justice and computation of taxable turnover were treated as issues that could be raised before the appellate authority, and the restriction on remand under Section 62(6-A) did not justify bypassing the appeal. As notice had been issued and objections filed, no serious breach of natural justice, patent lack of jurisdiction, or other exceptional ground for interference under Article 226 was shown. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330191