<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330186</link>
    <description>The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the petitioner&#039;s activities were taxable under specified categories. Exemptions under sections 97 and 98 did not apply to airport runways. The extended period of limitation was deemed justified due to non-disclosure of activities. Penalties were upheld as the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence. The writ petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330186</link>
      <description>The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the petitioner&#039;s activities were taxable under specified categories. Exemptions under sections 97 and 98 did not apply to airport runways. The extended period of limitation was deemed justified due to non-disclosure of activities. Penalties were upheld as the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence. The writ petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>