<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Personal Hearing</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110659</link>
    <description>Parties who miss a personal hearing may request an additional opportunity; authorities generally allow up to three adjournments and are liberal in granting rehearings. Ex parte decisions made after missed hearings are often remanded to secure compliance with natural justice. Adjudicating officers lack power to review their own final orders; the practical remedy is to appeal to the next forum to seek remand for fresh hearing on grounds of denial of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:12:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Personal Hearing</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110659</link>
      <description>Parties who miss a personal hearing may request an additional opportunity; authorities generally allow up to three adjournments and are liberal in granting rehearings. Ex parte decisions made after missed hearings are often remanded to secure compliance with natural justice. Adjudicating officers lack power to review their own final orders; the practical remedy is to appeal to the next forum to seek remand for fresh hearing on grounds of denial of hearing.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:12:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>