https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330176 A company director's personal property could not be attached to recover the company's VAT dues because the company and its directors remain distinct legal entities. The Gujarat HC noted that the VAT Act did not treat the director as personally liable for the company's tax debt, and no material justified lifting the corporate veil. In the absence of statutory authority or facts warranting personal fastening of liability, recovery from the director's residential assets was impermissible. The attachment order was therefore quashed. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:26:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330176 A company director's personal property could not be attached to recover the company's VAT dues because the company and its directors remain distinct legal entities. The Gujarat HC noted that the VAT Act did not treat the director as personally liable for the company's tax debt, and no material justified lifting the corporate veil. In the absence of statutory authority or facts warranting personal fastening of liability, recovery from the director's residential assets was impermissible. The attachment order was therefore quashed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330176