<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 764 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330166</link>
    <description>A stamp duty exemption notification was applied to the sale deed for purchase of a sick industrial unit, and the court treated the sickness certificate as sufficient despite its initial issue by the Commissioner Industries rather than the General Manager, District Industries Centre. It held that the issuing authority was within the same department and that a technical objection should not defeat the beneficial purpose of the exemption. The later rectification by the General Manager, District Industries Centre was held to relate back to the original certificate, so the exemption could not be denied on that defect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:06:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 764 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330166</link>
      <description>A stamp duty exemption notification was applied to the sale deed for purchase of a sick industrial unit, and the court treated the sickness certificate as sufficient despite its initial issue by the Commissioner Industries rather than the General Manager, District Industries Centre. It held that the issuing authority was within the same department and that a technical objection should not defeat the beneficial purpose of the exemption. The later rectification by the General Manager, District Industries Centre was held to relate back to the original certificate, so the exemption could not be denied on that defect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>