<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 59 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4195</link>
    <description>CESTAT dismissed the revenue appeal and upheld the assessee, holding that the demand for service tax on the gross commission could not be sustained. The tribunal rejected revenue&#039;s contention that tax must be levied on the gross amount where service tax was not collected separately, finding the invocation of section 67 to treat the gross receipt as value plus tax was not tenable in the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 59 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4195</link>
      <description>CESTAT dismissed the revenue appeal and upheld the assessee, holding that the demand for service tax on the gross commission could not be sustained. The tribunal rejected revenue&#039;s contention that tax must be levied on the gross amount where service tax was not collected separately, finding the invocation of section 67 to treat the gross receipt as value plus tax was not tenable in the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>