<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 755 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330157</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging Notices issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act to reopen assessments for multiple years. The Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to reopen assessments was a mere change of opinion without alleging any failure to disclose material facts, rendering the Notices jurisdictionally invalid under Section 147. Issuing the Notices to reconsider decisions already addressed in regular assessment proceedings and CIT(A) appeals was deemed impermissible. Consequently, the Court found the Notices to be without jurisdiction and ruled in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:03:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 755 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330157</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case challenging Notices issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act to reopen assessments for multiple years. The Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to reopen assessments was a mere change of opinion without alleging any failure to disclose material facts, rendering the Notices jurisdictionally invalid under Section 147. Issuing the Notices to reconsider decisions already addressed in regular assessment proceedings and CIT(A) appeals was deemed impermissible. Consequently, the Court found the Notices to be without jurisdiction and ruled in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>