<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 656 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184748</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty order, emphasizing the necessity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction before initiating penalties. Despite an alternative contention referred to a larger Bench, the Court found no discernible satisfaction in the assessment order and clarified that even if the larger Bench issue is resolved affirmatively, the penalty proceedings in this case cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:58:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 656 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184748</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty order, emphasizing the necessity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction before initiating penalties. Despite an alternative contention referred to a larger Bench, the Court found no discernible satisfaction in the assessment order and clarified that even if the larger Bench issue is resolved affirmatively, the penalty proceedings in this case cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>