<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 735 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal confirmed that tax was not deductible on provisions made without identifying the payee. The consistent accounting method followed by the assessee, accepted by the Department in subsequent years, was crucial in the decision. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision was rendered on 10th June 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 735 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal confirmed that tax was not deductible on provisions made without identifying the payee. The consistent accounting method followed by the assessee, accepted by the Department in subsequent years, was crucial in the decision. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision was rendered on 10th June 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>