<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 734 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330136</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the A.O. to delete the additions made towards land reclamation and afforestation expenditure, recognizing the provision as an allowable deduction under the mercantile system of accounting. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory and contractual obligations necessitating these expenses and treated them as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 734 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330136</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the A.O. to delete the additions made towards land reclamation and afforestation expenditure, recognizing the provision as an allowable deduction under the mercantile system of accounting. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory and contractual obligations necessitating these expenses and treated them as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>