<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2512 - ITAT Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of a claim for deduction under section 37(1) for revenue expenditure. Citing a previous decision with similar facts where the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, the Tribunal found no distinguishing factors and directed the deletion of the disallowed amount. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2512 - ITAT Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of a claim for deduction under section 37(1) for revenue expenditure. Citing a previous decision with similar facts where the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, the Tribunal found no distinguishing factors and directed the deletion of the disallowed amount. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>