<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1090 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184727</link>
    <description>A planning statute will not give rise to deemed permission where the authority requisitions further information and the applicant does not comply; in that situation, closure of the application is treated as rejection, not automatic approval. The draft town development scheme was also held not to be invalid: the two-year period under the Act could run from the later of two gazette declarations, and publication in the official gazette completed the statutory publication requirement while newspaper publication served additional publicity and objection-notice purposes only. Once a draft development scheme was published, permission or a no objection certificate for inconsistent development could properly be refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1090 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184727</link>
      <description>A planning statute will not give rise to deemed permission where the authority requisitions further information and the applicant does not comply; in that situation, closure of the application is treated as rejection, not automatic approval. The draft town development scheme was also held not to be invalid: the two-year period under the Act could run from the later of two gazette declarations, and publication in the official gazette completed the statutory publication requirement while newspaper publication served additional publicity and objection-notice purposes only. Once a draft development scheme was published, permission or a no objection certificate for inconsistent development could properly be refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>