<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1090 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184719</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by various Krishi Upaj Mandi Samitis regarding the claim of exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act were allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority, including the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), has the power to entertain a new claim for deduction without the need for a revised return. The decision was based on a previous Bench ruling and a Jodhpur Bench decision, leading to the allowance of all the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1090 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184719</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by various Krishi Upaj Mandi Samitis regarding the claim of exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act were allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority, including the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), has the power to entertain a new claim for deduction without the need for a revised return. The decision was based on a previous Bench ruling and a Jodhpur Bench decision, leading to the allowance of all the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>