https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330129 Cancellation of bail for breach of imposed monetary and restrictive conditions was upheld. Revision cannot be used to introduce, for the first time, a legal contention on the cognizable or non-bailable character of an alleged Finance Act offence when that contention was available during the earlier bail and cancellation proceedings. Ignorance of the existing legal position does not justify raising the point belatedly. The revisional challenge was rejected because the cancellation order was legal and proper and warranted no interference. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:50:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330129 Cancellation of bail for breach of imposed monetary and restrictive conditions was upheld. Revision cannot be used to introduce, for the first time, a legal contention on the cognizable or non-bailable character of an alleged Finance Act offence when that contention was available during the earlier bail and cancellation proceedings. Ignorance of the existing legal position does not justify raising the point belatedly. The revisional challenge was rejected because the cancellation order was legal and proper and warranted no interference. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330129