<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 723 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330125</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order requiring a pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, after the appellant eventually complied. The court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits, emphasizing the importance of compliance for proper adjudication. If the appellant had not deposited the amount, the original order would have stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:48:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 723 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330125</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order requiring a pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, after the appellant eventually complied. The court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits, emphasizing the importance of compliance for proper adjudication. If the appellant had not deposited the amount, the original order would have stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>