<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330102</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, reversing the orders of the CIT(A)-40 Mumbai and deleting the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill made by the AO for AY 2002-03. The ITAT&#039;s decision was influenced by the absence of incriminating material found during the search, aligning with the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay&#039;s decision. Consequently, the penalty order did not survive due to the deletion of the addition in the quantum appeal, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee in both penalty proceedings and assessment discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330102</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, reversing the orders of the CIT(A)-40 Mumbai and deleting the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill made by the AO for AY 2002-03. The ITAT&#039;s decision was influenced by the absence of incriminating material found during the search, aligning with the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay&#039;s decision. Consequently, the penalty order did not survive due to the deletion of the addition in the quantum appeal, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee in both penalty proceedings and assessment discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>