<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 688 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the peak of unexplained cash utilized for cash purchases. The decision highlights the need for proper documentation to substantiate purchases and the challenges in verifying transaction genuineness in cases of alleged bogus purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 688 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the peak of unexplained cash utilized for cash purchases. The decision highlights the need for proper documentation to substantiate purchases and the challenges in verifying transaction genuineness in cases of alleged bogus purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>