<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 685 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330087</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part by the Appellate Tribunal in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reduce the disallowance under section 14A by the expenses already offered by the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for a higher rebate amount under section 88E based on the total taxable income from the business activity, rejecting the lower authorities&#039; decision to reduce the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 685 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330087</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part by the Appellate Tribunal in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reduce the disallowance under section 14A by the expenses already offered by the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for a higher rebate amount under section 88E based on the total taxable income from the business activity, rejecting the lower authorities&#039; decision to reduce the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>