<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 99 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4177</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s role under Section 115-J of the Income Tax Act was limited to verifying certified accounts under the Companies Act and not to dictate the depreciation calculation method. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the higher depreciation claimed and disposed of the reference accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 99 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4177</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s role under Section 115-J of the Income Tax Act was limited to verifying certified accounts under the Companies Act and not to dictate the depreciation calculation method. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the higher depreciation claimed and disposed of the reference accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>