<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 683 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330085</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the appellant on both issues. The Tribunal emphasized that ownership extends beyond registration for depreciation claims, considering factors like possession, dominion, and control. It also highlighted the importance of specific evidence when disallowing business expenses, leading to the deletion of an ad hoc disallowance of trip expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 683 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330085</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the appellant on both issues. The Tribunal emphasized that ownership extends beyond registration for depreciation claims, considering factors like possession, dominion, and control. It also highlighted the importance of specific evidence when disallowing business expenses, leading to the deletion of an ad hoc disallowance of trip expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>