<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 701 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184692</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 for the assessment year 2005-06. The CIT&#039;s decision to compute deduction under section 10A for the STPI unit after setting off losses of the non-STPI unit was rejected. The ITAT held that the CIT erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 as there were conflicting legal precedents on whether losses of non-10A unit can be set off against the income of the 10A unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 17:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 701 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184692</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 for the assessment year 2005-06. The CIT&#039;s decision to compute deduction under section 10A for the STPI unit after setting off losses of the non-STPI unit was rejected. The ITAT held that the CIT erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 as there were conflicting legal precedents on whether losses of non-10A unit can be set off against the income of the 10A unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>