https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330075 The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking rectification of the order, stating that the mistake pointed out did not fall under Section 254(2) of the Act. The appeal was dismissed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were also rejected with no order as to costs. The judgment clarified the finality of decisions made by the Tribunal, the limitations on re-arguing issues already adjudicated, and the scope of rectification under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jul 2016 13:10:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330075 The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking rectification of the order, stating that the mistake pointed out did not fall under Section 254(2) of the Act. The appeal was dismissed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were also rejected with no order as to costs. The judgment clarified the finality of decisions made by the Tribunal, the limitations on re-arguing issues already adjudicated, and the scope of rectification under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330075